![]() ![]() ![]() Concerning the potential factors contributing to the comprehension of garden path sentences, most studies focused on individuals’ language proficiency, including basic words, syntactic knowledge, and thematic roles (e.g., Ferreira and Henderson, 1991 Christianson et al., 2001 Brothers et al., 2021). The garden path sentence has received great attention in the literature. One of the most distinctive features of such sentences, as suggested by many scholars, is something luring readers into a very probable interpretation, which later turns out to be incompatible with the end of the sentence ( Besserman and Kaiser, 2017 Masia et al., 2017 Yoo et al., 2017 Demberg and Keller, 2019). Chances of falling into the tricky trap of such ambiguous sentences are great for readers in most cases. Garden path sentence, however, also known as one type of syntactically ambiguous sentence ( Lee, 2006), would lead readers along different paths before they form accurate comprehension. Sentence comprehension is believed to be an incremental process ( Demberg and Keller, 2019), during which readers constantly construct temporary and changeable meaning before they arrive at the end of the sentence. These findings reveal that only certain aspects of cognitive control influence garden path sentence comprehension. However, there were no differences between the high and low inhibition and shifting groups in ambiguity resolution. The results of independent t-test analyses revealed that the high working memory (WM) group was faster in ambiguity resolution, and so was the high monitoring group. Data analysis results showed a significant garden path effect on response times (RTs) and accuracy among all the participants. In the current study, the English (L2) Sentence Processing Task and a series of cognitive control tasks were administered among 111 young adult Chinese–English bilinguals to investigate the influence of different components of cognitive control on garden path sentence comprehension, with other factors such as age, socio-economic status, and language proficiency strictly matched. Foreign Languages College, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, Chinaįew studies have examined the role of cognitive control in processing ambiguity, let alone the roles of different components of cognitive control.Zhilong Xie *, Guofang Zeng, Shuya Zhou and Juan Wang ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |